BIOSIGNOVERSAL AGE BY SHRIDHAR TILVE
Now we have entered in the FIFTH YUG CHINHASRUSHTIY YUG
which is the YUG of BIOSIGNOVERSE. Before EXPLORING the
networking potentialities of BIOSIGNOVERSAL network let us ask the first
question.
India
Why should we bother about biosignoverse so intensly right now?
The answer is very clear
for me . When post vishiyata was
experimenting with the internal migration & internal mixing of O.B.C. , B.C. ,S.C. ,S.T. in India
'prechnyiyata' in EUROPE was experimenting with the external & mixing
migration of higher class in abroad. The external phenomenon was creating the
new global class of Indians. First time
in the history of India the home of rule phase find the nonresidential audience
for its first level addressing which listens its tastes, address, watch its
movie & trying to understand.
This new Posthomerulee
movement & market both have entered in India & there is lot of
suffering, surfing & enthusiasm about it. Market and Posthomerule both are
supporting the postmodernism & yet they are fighting with each other.Biosignoverse
has provided speed for this connectivity and it is influencing life from
outside INDIA. After liberation INDIA has accepted BIOSIGNOVERSITY as new age
phenomenon and it has changed Indian Society forever .To understand this
phenomenon we have to study postmodern ethos as well as Biosignoverse.
2
When
I launched the new literary movement chauthi navta in 1992 against postmodernism
nobody took it seriously in Marathi but suddenly after some time everybody started talking about it in our
literature field. The movement contexted
the CHINHASRUSHTIY YUG or YUG of
biosignoverse and rebel against postmodernism . What's biosignoverse ? BIOSIGNOVERSE
is the network of semioditing. Semioditing is the Kriya which involves signing,digitaling,programming
, texting and simulating. Before the yug of biosignoverse signing and texting were unavoidable part of
community and in European countries it has reached in semiospheric height but
they were active as Nonsemioditic analogus entity. But in biosignoverse commodity
is replaced by semiodity, production is replaced by prosemioduction in form of
digital form made up of first form of
spandas i e bytes and bits (the
phenomenon where programme is unavoidable part of commodity which transfers the
commodity into semiodity). Semiodity is the programmed commodity which not only
represents the production but semioduction also where programming handles the
action related with commodity through programme-handler. For example this hall
or place is commodity but if somebody programme its every aspect i.e. the door
, the window etc. & create remote
control by human hand it will turn into
semoidity
Why
I was bothering about these questions so intensly at that time?
The answer was very
clear for me. Nativism sponsered by
Bhalchandra Nemade in local area and both Posthomerulee movement &
market in gloabal network have entered in India & there is lot of suffering,
surfing & enthusiasm about them. Market and Posthomerule both are
supporting the postmodernism & yet
they are fighting with each other and to counter them native movement with
hindutwawadi agenda was emerging before me. For me traditional nativism was not
the solution for new age problem .Before discussing the
networking potentialities of biosignoversal network let us ask the last question.The
SRUSHTIY YUG had created the ideology which helped us to create out Indian
national identity. But for new chinhasrutiya YUG we have to create
continentology as special branch which
will create continental identity. For ASIA we need to create Asiology which
will create ASIAN identity. Last fifteen years
Europe is trying to create its identity as a continent Europology is not yet established but one day it will be
created & creation of Euro is a revolutionary step towards it.
For
asian Identity we have to solve our linguistic problem atleast on asian level. In
PrastuSRUSHTIY YUG English language was established as our national margi
language. It not only displaced the other margis like Sanskrit & Persian
but also paved the way for Hindustani as fourth margi. Hindustani is our
CHINHASRUSHTIY margi mainly created by bollywood & T.V channels It has not
ability to displace English. So in contemporary scenerio INGLISH ( NOT ENGLISH) will be another
MARGI. So, in REALITY we are travelling with two margis. This bilingual margiyata is paving way for mixed margi i.e.hinglish. so, in fact we are
travelling with three margi & this trilingual margiyata is bound to create
many linguistic problems. Hindustani has every potential to become continental
language of ASIA. These three margis are providing substance. For every
paradigms we must remember that every Indian paradigms must be nourished by
deshi, poti & jamatiya substance. For asiology we must be nourished by the
margis, deshi, poti & Jamatiy
substance of each ASIAN nation. It is not easy to create ASIAN values. Dr. Amartya Sen has discussed complexities
& difficulties in his essay, “our culture their culture (the argumentive Indian – Amartya sen Penguin books pages
134-138) & pointed out that
''In our heterogeneity & in our openness lies our pride,
not our disgrace.''
No
doubt openness is necessary but we must be cautionary about this openness
because many time our too much openness can open the door for our
disgrace.
Unfortunately
instead of ASIALOGY after an adavancement
of CHINHASRUSHTIY YUG many Indian
thinkers started to import EUROPEAN paradigms blindly to study its content
& structure. I wrote a poem in 1990 much before this import and published
it in Saushthav Feb 1993 issue. The
title was “post-post-post”. It is related with all so called phenomenon
like post modernism, post colonialism etc etc. I am translating it here for
readers.
“POST-POST-POST”
I LOOK
V
E An
intellectual bankruptacy
R of
existance
T
I
C Its
Depositioning
A
L lonely alonely
Their styles of
uncontrolled mobility
of import facing
postiest
unhandicapply.
The immeasurable miracle of
meta
MORPHOSIS
absolutely mute.
With strengthy mischievousness.
A
G
G
R
E
S
S
I
O
N
Of
freestyles and seductions
the flat lossjump of unfearful tapasya .
In
borrowed ?????????question
In imported !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!answers
And unanswerable
I
standing untouchable
Experiencing.
The comic ruindust of aloneliness
and
The tragic troublemess of
mountainees
It was foretelling but unfortunately nobody in Marathi
literature & civilization understood
POMO's villainish negativity. Ethos of postmodernity entered with its
new post modern paradigms & now Marathi senerio is possessed by post modern
paradigms. Why I am so against postmodernism? Let's start from Jeans Francois Lyotard the man who is
responsible for an advancement of postmodern paradigms in European philosophy .
To understand my stance we have to understand my equations with NAYAS
3
THE
POSITION OF nayas IN CHINHASRUSHTI
Every human being has nine nayas
& their networking function as human being in cosmos. It's really difficult
to translate the concept of hay in English. It's around the meaning of
principles all individual paradigms are the paradigms of these nine nayas. I am
presenting these nine nayas table. It's to difficult to translate the Sanskrit
words as they loss the essence of meaning in English translation.
|
Avastha >
|
Sat(EXISTENCE)
|
Chit(INTELLIGENCE)
|
Anand
(BLISS)
|
Shiv(SELF)
|
Shakti(WILL)
|
Kriya(ACTION)
|
Avkash (SPACE)
|
Kal (METATIME)
|
|
STATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gupt(hidden)
|
Saushthav(bodymould)
|
Janiv(consciousness)
|
Swabhav(nature)
|
Sanvedak(senser)
|
Asoshi(isslust)
|
Spandan(bit)
|
Paryawaran(environment)
|
Mahakal(megatime)
|
|
Supt(halfhidden)
|
Ang(organbody)
|
Budhi(intellect)
|
Bhav(feeling)
|
Bodhak(perceptor)
|
Pipasa(desire)
|
Sfooran(bitcluster)
|
Bhoogol(geography)
|
Kalh(timeflow)
|
|
Prakat(sensual)
|
Shabir(body)
|
Vichar(thought)
|
Bhavna(emotion)
|
Karta(doer)
|
Asakti(atachment)
|
Halchal(movement)
|
Kshetra(field)
|
Velh(moment)
|
|
Jagrut(aware)
|
Deh(builtbody)
|
Vivek(reason)
|
Ras(feel
flow)
|
Sadhak()
|
Ichha(wish)
|
Kriti(act)
|
Paiss
|
Mrutyu(death)
|
|
Unnat(awaken)
|
Kaya(vitalbody)
|
Pragnya(wisdom)
|
Bhakti(devotion)
|
Sakshi(witness)
|
Sfoorti(spontaneity)
|
Kartavya(duty)
|
Anant(infinit)
|
Maha-mrutyu(megadeath)
|
|
Mukt(enlightened)
|
Chaitanya(body)
|
Satya
(truth)
|
Shanty(peace)
|
Budhh(budhha)
|
Pratibha(creativity)
|
Karm(karma)
|
Poornn(complete)
|
Shoonya(shoonya)
|
The
chinhasrushiya YUG is transforming the all PreatiSRUSHTIY Jeevanprabandhan into
Jeevan networks. The liquidity of jeevanprabandhan is transforming itself into
gaseousity of jeevan networks. Every individual is turning into either cloud or
amoeba. In this atmosphere we are passing through the post post industrial
ethos which has created new encounter with EUROPEAN. In SRUSHTIY AND PRATISRUSHTIY
YUG the victory of British over us compelled us to rethink & now
advancement of globalisation and postmodernism is compelling us to ask some questions about
everything
These questions are
1)
What part of EUROPEAN paradigms should we put
our Indian paradigms?
2)
What can we leave out & what can we
carry out with us of their existence ?
3)
Would we rather back to our
PRATISRUSHTIY jeevanprabandhan or SRUSHTIY jeevandhara or vishwaya jeevandarshans?
4)
Can we conduct our own orchestra of
paradigms & use EUROPEAN musicians only for special second effects?
For me third question will not solve any problem.
Some
people are going back to jeevandhara or jeevanprabandhan or darshan. But it
will not help us. So it's better to ask first two question in initial phase.
If we want answer to
this questions we have to go through some postmodern paradigms.
4
If
we carefully study the logic behind the report on knowledge discoursed in the
book entitled. “The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge written by Lyotard
(see Lyotard Jeans Francois 1984 the postmodern condition : A report on
knowledge Tran G. Bennington & B. Massumi Manchester, Manchester university
press) we will find that it is helping both Posthomerule as well as Market as both
are travelling without any idea of destination neither knowing what good
society means for them nor sure about their vehicle and it's nature whether
it's real or hyperreal and interestingly both are supported by same philosophy which
doesn't know what philosophy means for it.
Lyotard attacked on
science in this discourse but he was not the pioneer. Before him Paul K.
Feyerabend attacked science in his book “Against Method”. He says,
“Archaism
perhaps not the most attractive political philosophy but it is certainly
excellent medicine for epistemology and for the philosophy of science”(page
17)
''Thus science is the much closer to
myth than a scientific philosophy is prepared to admit. It is one of the many
forms of thought that have been developed by man and not necessarily best. It
is conspicuous, noisy and impudent but it is inherently superior only for those
who have already decided in favour of a certain ideology, or who have accepted
it without having ever examined its advantages and limits. And as the accepting
and rejecting of ideologies should be left to the individual it follows that
the separation of state and church must be supplemented by the separation of
state & science, that most recent, most aggressive and most dogmatic
religious institution. Such a separation may be our only chance to achieve a
humanity we are capable of, but have never fully realized.''
(conclusion given on
page 15 index against method outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge Paul
K. Feyerabend NLB London 1975)
This
anarchistic view is contraty to the view of philosophers who advocated science
‘as a model of all human knowledge’ applicable universally to whole mankind . Isaiah
Berlin point out that
“The
18th century is perhaps the last period in the history of western
Europe when human omniscience was thought to be an attainable goal. (Isaiah
Berlin: The age of enlightenment page 14 A mentor book 1956).
According to Lyotard the
human omniscience & its goal seems
unavoidable. The myths legitamize themselves- make themselves believable just
in the telling. Scientist also legitimatise themselves just in the telling but
they have different kind of language game.
Science cannot depend upon science and to legitimatise itself it must
turn to narratives. Generally it depends on two other narrative the first is
political the second philosophical. These two narratives legitimatise that
science & reason will bring the progress & freedom. But after second world
war people no longer believes as they used science to establish their power
over others. A quantum physics led us to believe that electrons can travel two
different paths through space simultaneously or pass from one orbit to another
without crossing the space in between. Science have abandon its claim for
decidable truth and seeks to legitimatise itself though performativity. So
science is no longer concerned with truth. But it's success lies in it's
permormativity. This changed position of science gets down the grandnarrative
of science created by enlightenment & convert it into only one of many
ideologies.
This
stance clear cut help the Jihad of Neo Homerulism. If science is not giving
truth then one can seek final truth in his faith without giving any reason. Naturally
the theory of evolution can be displaced by theory of creation in schools. All
non europeon countries accept the superiority of Europeon nation because they
really think that science is superior and as Europeon are owner of it they have
every right to dominate non-europeon nations. Now they no more need to accept
this theory. As Lyotard says in postmodern society (societies) many
micronarratives are jammed together and
this carnival of narratives replace the monolithic presence of one
metanarrative. The only problem which he could not see is the problem of
Jihad proclaimed by all micronarratives to survive their rational and
irrational faith against meganarraitives. After cold war the void is filled in
by a kind of storytelling that doesn’t seek to legitimatise their act by
postmodern logic.
I find this situation
sometime pathetic because first Europeon came & taught us to believe the
science as a metanarrative of truth & we believed it. Now they are teaching
us to doubt it and treat it as mere one of many ideologies and without doubting
and raising question we are accepting it . In both situation we are behaving
like headless creature. It is really tragic & shows the poverty of
originality.
The
same discourse by Lyotard is helping the market as Lyolard not only gets down
the grandnarrative of science but the major metanarratives like philosophies of
Marx & Hegel created by the enlightenment which believes the liberation of
humanity & the attainment of a pure self conscious spirit the Unity of all
knowledge . Lyotard did mention the narration of Christan salvation as
meganarrative.
It’s really ironical to
see that the enlightenment project which dreamed to emancipate whole humankind
from the traditional chain is enchained itself by a discourse emancipating the
every megastructure from its universal programme of progress.
I think the paradigms of death is constantly appearing in EUROPEAN
postmodern thought process for e.g. the following death announced
The
following table indicates the maganarrative it's centre and the post modern
death paradigm.
Nay Metanarrative centre death paradigm postdeath paradigm
Sat naya
Chit naya Rationalism reason Ideology is dead
Anand naya -
Shiv naya individualism/ ‘I’ subject subject is dead
existentialism Subject is dead
Shakti naya Romanticism creator/ author is dead
author Author is
dead
Kriya=naya
Interconnectivity
Space naya
Globalisation
Time naya Progressism history history is dead
Probably only death is not dead. If we carefully observe the
deathparadgm
We find that
1). Death of body
2).death of emotion
3).death of action
4).death of nation
are not announced by post modernism .
Why this happened ?
It is because the market unconsciously
rule the discourse of postmodernism? Or is it the character feature of
chinhasrushtiya/ bio-signoversal yug itself ?
Every market
wants to keep costumers bodies alive & if death of them are announced it
ultimetly results into death of customer. Market dosen’t want it.
The death of
emotion or bliss is not articulated because the phenomenon of market economy is
constantly playing with the emotions of the customers & assuring them bliss
& more bliss though seductions. Death of bliss or emotion means death of
market itself . market dosen’t want it .
The death of
action is not proclaimed because interconnectivity among human bodies is the
foundation of any market network & if death of action is happened the death
of interconnectivity will follow it & situation ultimetly results into
chaos in market. Market dosen’t want it.
The most
astonishing feature is the ‘’death of nation’’ paradigm . it’s not announced The death of nation should be also announced & and it is really surprising that it;s not announced . Logically globalization is the main spacial process
happening all over glob and death of nation will help it. Yet nobody is announcing it. It means still
Euroamerican feel the necessity of the
nation. It is really interesting to see that they are constantly fighting
against the pan Islamic terrorism which doesn’t believe nation theory. For them
the nation must be dead & all muslim
should be United. Probably to save their EUROPEAN & American civilization
from terrorism they still feel the necessity of nation.
The death of ideology is necessary because it clearly shows the
victory of democracy over other cracy and victory of capitalisms over
communism.
The death
of subject is necessary because subject can become sakshi or enlightened person
which will make him aware about morality & ethics & it is dangerous to
be awakened for market.
The death of Author is also advocated because after that death
product can be cut off from its creator and all text whether of humanities or
science or arts can turn easily into the
semiodity.
The death
of history is necessary because market works only on the base of
contemporariness. The present tense is the tense of market.
All these death paradigms are helping
market to produce consumer culture everywhere. If we carefully observe the
phenomenon we find that only those
deaths are marketed which are useful to market. All these deaths are selling
like hot brands and an auction carnivals of intellectuals are running like
seductive films.
It doesn’t mean that market has
created the postmodernism. What I want to say is the paraworldal pratisrushtiyta created the market & for an analysis of
the market thinkers like M. Kohler, Michel Benamexi, Charles Caramello, Ihab
Hassan coined the postmodern logic in their initial work. For example,
As I said
earlier in pratisrushtiya network the specialist musicians were important to
create the orchestration in studio & linear recording was the phenomenon.
Previous month I myself recorded the jingle. In this recording the linear
recording was displaced by recording in discontinuities with the advanced
semiotic machinery .Now we can record last line first time then 4th
line and then 2nd line . The
orchestration was created with the help of computer & musicians were displaced
by programmed music. It's really interesting to note that while editing the
music 'We' were not emphasing the actual sound but giving primary importance to
virtual diagrams of sound. We can call this sound as virtual sound expressed in
digital signs. This phenomenon is definitely changing the music scenario &
A.R. Reheman is the only music director who is creatively using this virtual
sound (we no more call music as music we use the word ‘sound’ for music) I call this process ‘The semioduction’ where
semiodities are used to create the semiodity (of music) & programme is
induced in commodity making it semiodity.
..........
This semioduction has changed the
structure of market as well as ethos of Jihad. Like music the human being were
also semioducted by terrorists sponsered by Home Rule organisation for Jihad
& they get transformed into ‘semiodity’ i.e. Human Bomb (National
geographic channel has created many documentaries like suicide web on this
issues & transmitted them in Dec. 2006 in terrorism special series). The
celebrity status after becoming Hutatma & their transmission on channel is
one of the fascinating reasons for becoming Human Bomb. In srushtiya yug human
bomb was impossible for e.g. In 1605, during the reign of James I, a plot was
hatched for the blowing up of house of Lords with the king, Lord and Bishop
assembled there following James’s announcement that he would never grand
toleration to the Roman Catholics guy Fawkes (can we call him christen Jihadi)
undertook to fire the gun power concealed underneath the building, but on the
night of 4 Nov 1604 , it was discovered with box of matches and a dark lanterm
in the cellars. He & seven others were executed on scaffold.
(see
Bertrand Russell the impact of science on society page 194 counterpoint)
Today guy fawkes may prefer to become human bomb
for his Jihad
Now question arise why
Islam & all other native groups are raising Jihad? Why the Burqua is
suddenly surfaced as life or death issue? Four kind of discourse are
functioning behind the Jihad of Posthomerulism.
1)
Dream body discourse
2)
Sub body discourse
3)
Body discourse
4)
Hyper body discourse
Like
home rule mode in srushtiya network this Neo-home-rule mode of Islam &
other native culture is also biaddressing through its act. An attack on twin
towers was not only addressing to Islam but Euro America also & this time Euro
America couldn’t afford to unlisten it. All those above discourses are
biaddressual discourses.
The dream body discourse is the
discourse of unconscious fuctions in the dreambody in context of society. It is
the dream as well as reality.
The possibility of death is always
everywhere as death can touch you at any moment without giving any symbolic
warning. The fear that death is possible without giving any information search
the probability of death everywhere. The probability of death in exchange of
rational modernity is the unconscious trauma always playing the symbolic cards
in Islam. “Islam is in danger” or “The language or culture is in danger” are
slogans created by this card . It is the cry of wounded civilization which once
ruled this world in srushtiya yug. Today you are either in limelight or in
darkness of death & unconsciously Jihad is only option left for many
Neohomerulist organisations to keep themselves alive in the limelight which
they are choosing in dream rule position. The heavy & mass dominated
society crushes under its gravitational force of traditional text & textual
tradition collecting its fragments through Jihad which many time function as an
escape in short jump. It’s attempt to revive the history which is enrooted in
one’s self is the keynote notion of this scream of terror.
Here
the discourse expresses what’s repressed. The fear, the panic, the terror are
strong uraniumic feelings & passion to fight for whole, on behalf of whole
can be activated by any imaginative alarm.
In the dream body discourse
nothing is in place lies disorder out of
fear which has the desire but aimless. The subbody discourse is addicted to
establishment order without realising the change in the & outside the body
deconstructing the possibilities of adaption ability. For it, what they are
doing is logical & in long team help welfare of their own body.
The anti modern sub-body
discourse in Jihad is expressed on their own culture through numerous events.
The life of modern social reformer Mr. Hameed Dalwai is a sad story of tragic
end where he was completely alienated by his contemporary KAUMI log. His appeal
to modernise the Islam went in vain in Maharashtra. Turkastan, the main forte
of modernist is still secular but could not even become a charter member of ICO
because of the commitment to secularism in its constitution.
In Pakistan, Fajlool
Rehman brought an analysis on decay of
Islam in front of Islamism in his book “Islam And Modernity” but instead of
discussing the discourse he was compelled by fundamentalist to leave the
country. Nus Hameed Abu Zaid was also expelled by his country for new analysis
of Koran in Egypt. I myself was attacked by Hindu fundamentalist when I wrote a
poem “Bandhakam chalu aahe” in which I
told that the Vittal is no more central deity of Maharashtra & Saibaba has
replaced the Vittal. It is easy to point the finger to America (the foreign hand) but it will not
solve our problematics. The sub-body discourse “to fear the change” emerge from
the cracking the mirror cells of communication on culture body. To understand
this phenomenon we have to understand the ASD(Autism spectrum disorder).
Leo Kaner & Hans
Asperger discovered the disease ‘Autism’ where patient is so narcissied by
Autos (self) that he can’t mix up effectively in society. (Autism spectrum
disorder) Dr. V.S. Ramchandran has explained this phenomenon. In 1995-96
scientists have discovered the mirrorcells in our brain. The feeling about
‘other’/ the communication with ‘other’ are the capacities created by these
mirrorcells. By various experiments, Dr. Ramchandran proves that in the patient
of Autism these mirrorcells are either blocked/choked or disappeared.
Same phenomenon can
happen in cultural or social body where mirrorcells of particular society or
cultural are blocked/ disappeared & like patient of autism these bodies
started to negate the capacity to feel for other or capacity to learn the other
language or an ability to imitate ‘other’. This Social Autism spectrum disorder
(SASD) alienate the society to such an extent that the ‘change’ becomes the
‘other’ for them. Islam is almost on the verge of this SASD but I think this
grate culture has ability to avoid it. Right now this SASD is functioning as
sub-real discourse for some Neohomerulism. It doesn’t mean that all
Neohomeruliest societies and cultures are facing SASD. Some bodies genuinely
want to invent their own paradigm. So that they can establish new social
spectrum order (SSD) in their own body.
It’s really difficult to
study the body discourse as it’s complex & problematic to define body in
sense of body as body is no more body in this atmosphere. But yet real is
functioning today not as grandnarrative but as a micronarrative discourse.
There are three types of
body discourse behind the Jihad of neohomerulsm as a micronarrative discourse.
1)
Brahmani related with wishwiyata
2)
Kshetriya related with srushtiyata
3)
Modern related with pratisrushtiyata
In
the history of Jihad 1857 is the most important year as first time above
mentioned three discourse occasioned in each other with their acidic
temperament in the form of mutiny. Munity & the word ‘Jihad’ is very
frequently used in Delhi by Muslims against modern white Europeon. No Briton
officer lived without fear of Indians after March 29,1857 & like 9/11
attack on twin tower it snatched safe heaven of safety from Europeons forever.
Now ‘they can be killed’ & this notion of possibility terriorised them.
Like Osama Bin Laden (who
was working for America in Afghnistan & rebelled later) over 1,00,000 trained Indians soldier upraised
against their employers the English East India company. Like George Bush &
America Britons retaliated & literally “peppered the niggers” & like
Afghanis more than 1 million people bulleted to death without discriminating
the civil & military people. The white thought that as “they had modern
maxim gun & Indians didn’t, they are safe” before this mutiny but after
1857 they tried to disarm every Indian just like Bush who is trying to
denuclearise & deweaponised other nations.
The cause was provided
by brahmani whishwiya religious body discourse. The sepoys came to know that
the grease used in the cartridge is produced from cow & pig lard. It was
sacrilege for Hindus and abomination for the Muslims. It infuriated the
religious sentiments & rebel happened.
The position of Indian
kshetriyata was similar to Afghani kshetriyata as there was no central leader
& every kshetra was behaving like Kabila scattered in many regions without
regulatory control. This anarchy & fragmentation in kshetriya discourse was
chaotic similar to contemporary situation in Iraq & Afghanistan. Too many
interest groups, too many leaders & too many power desires constantly
decentralising integration. After the defeat of Muslim emperor the domination
of Muslims over Hindu was over & they were replaced by British. It is
interesting to note that micronarrative of sepoy muity, micronarrative of
princely state, micronarrative of peasant uprising in the Doab & Awadh were
uprising against British & they all demanded Home rule. We can safely say
that it was first avtar of Homerulism where many indigenous & native
discourses stood against the Market. The modern discourse in this munity was
structured by east India company which was interested only in commerce &
profit. It wanted to regulate the raw material & natural resources in India
from England sent in the white troops in India with modern weapons to set up
new army collaborating British soldier with indigenous vernacular Indian
soldiers in same discoursestyle Same style is functioning for America who wants
to regulated the ‘OIL’
Now one can ask the
question why America is so obsessive with oil?
The cold war between
Russia & USA is responsible for it. The capitalism and communism were the
two faces of coin of modernity & both were trying to reach everywhere
through their ideologies they keep surveillance on each other’s production machinery. In post cold
war period also the role of oil played it’s part very well. As samual P.
Huntington point out, “the Gulf war was the first post cold war resourse war
between civilizations. At stake war where the bulk of the world’s largest oil
reserves would be controlled by Saudi & emirate government dependent on
western military power for their security or by independent antiwestern regimes
which would be able & might be willing to use the oil weapon against west
before the war Iran, Iraq the Gulf
cooperation council and the USA jostled for influence over the Gulf. After the
war the Persian gulf was an American lake (see Samuel P. Huntington the clash
of civilization and The remaking of world order page 251-252 penguin books
1996)////////////////
Recently Iraq study
group has published its report . It says, “Iraq has the world’s second largest
known oil reserves. Iraq’s national oil industry will be opened and
commercialised to foreign companies”. It spelled out recommendation no.63 which
call on us to assist Iraqui leader to
reorganise the national oil industry as a commercial enterprise” and to
“encourage investment in iraque’s oil sector by the international community
& by international energy companies”
(see
the Indian express international page 9 dated 10th December 2006)
As reporter Antonia
Juhasz of above next point out, “the report makes visible to everyone the
elephant in the room: that we are fighting killing & dying in a war for
oil”
Now USA is moving toward
post Gulf war phase. To understand her possessiveness about oil we must
understand the role of oil in cold war. The soviet Russian Economy survived due
to its cheap agriculture. She set up state industries by using prisoner as
cheap labourer unfortunately. She has to import food, consumer goods & oil
machinery in exchange of export of oil & gas. Realising sovient’s
dependency an oil & gas, USA started to play the oil card in middle east.
In 1980 USA managed to sink the oil prices which ultimately compelled U.S.S.R
either to increase the production of oil or deduct the consumption of oil in
own country. Unfortunately both these roads were jammed & U.S.S.R couldn’t
manage self sufficienty of oil in her own region. So she went to import of food
& consumer product to such an extent that the U.S.S.R economy literally
trembled. Garvochev tried to improve the
production but production falling & U.S.S.R govt. Compelled to take away
the subsidies from Russians which ultimately spread the discount & unrest
among people & U.S.S.R collapsed. Just by managing the oil line USA
defeated U.S.S.R. . Naturally for USA oil is the main weapon which lead them to
victory over U.S.S.R so USA is obsessive about oil.
In cold war period as
Samuel Huntington says, “the resurgence was stimulated and fuelled by oil boom
of 1970s, which greatly increased the wealth and power of Muslim nations and
enabled them to reverse the relations of domination that had existed with the
west . The Saudi, Libyan & other governments used their oil riches to
stimulate & finance the Muslim revival & Muslim wealth led Muslims to swing from fascination with
western culture to involvement in their own & willingness to assert the
place & importance of Islam in non Islamic societies. Just western wealth
had previously been seen as the evidence of superiority of western culture, oil
wealth was seen as evidence of the superiority of Islam”
(ibid
page 116 Samuel Huntington)
The major problem about
oil wealth is its character. It’s the wealth of natural sources
(srushtiya/kshetriya sources) in contrast to western wealth (which was
pratisrushtiya production wealth). As a rule it intensified the kshetriya &
kshatriya discourses instead of vishiyata. It wants reformation but not
modernity home rule but not independence or freedom. It wasn’t used for freedom
struggle, but for an uprising like 1857 against white burden under the
leadership of Ayatulla khomeni.
Like India, Iran had
three currents 1)Wishwiyata oriented- Mulla maulavism like Brahminism 2)
Srushtiyata oriented- kshetriy kings
& kshatraps who wanted to overthrow the regime of mulla maulivis 3)
pratisrushtiya oriented democratic but as I stated earlier USA like her
Europeon sister was fracturised when it came to execute the europeon democratic
paradigms in Non Europeon countries. She helped to overthrow the popular
democratic government of Mohammad Mossadegh in
1953 & put back Shah, Mohammad
Reza Pahlvi on his throne. Then, onwards, frequent anti-shah and anti American
protest occurred in Tehram. On Feb.1979 an Islamic brahmanical current replaced
the srushtiya oriented kshatriy current. It’s the reverse driving modern
democratic to>kshetriya shaha to>
Islamic Khammeni . USA was branded as ‘ Great Satan’. Islamic current welcomed
it as the best proof of America’s attitude toward ‘Islam’. After some year
present George W. Bush announced Iran as part of an ‘axis of evil’. In fact it
was ‘an axis of oil’ which America wanted to say but her image repressed.
This axis of oil had
four possible centres 1)Saudi Arabia : The mothertounge of Islam.
2)Iran:
The great grandmothertoungue of Islam
3)Iraq:
The Saddam Hussein who transform the toungue into sword
4)Pakistan
: The only counter centre of western toungue which can prohibit the influence
of Russian, China & India After 1857 Lord Cornew set up new system where
divide and rule policy became fundamental weopen and he made all
feudalistic rulers biritish kingsize
slaves.
USA is applying the same methodology
using..same method in different
contex & creating the impotent king and rulers who will listen her voice
& remix it with Islamic sound system. Saudi Arabia was swallowed in coldwar
period. Iraq in gulf was period Pakistan
in post gulf war period. Now the operation Iran is taking shape. If USA manage
to swallow the Iran. She will be in full controll of an axis of oil. After that
mission China will be imlemented.
Neohomerulism has probably realised unconsciously the axis of oil
& it is constructing the real discourse of Jihad for all indigenous
cultures. After 1857, as saleey in his book. "The Expansion of
England" says by fragmenting the culture using divide and rule policy
& managing artificial confrontations among casts British setteld in
Hindustan. Indirectly post modernism is helping market to fragment the cultures
& Islam now wants to create an alternative grand narrative to fight against
USA. Both are using postmordenism consuming its utility position according to
their moment to moment selfishness malling without any destination map. The
modern jihad commenced in 1857 is now completing 150 years in march 2007. In
1857 it was great failure because it was fought without realising the
importance of modernisation. It was reverse driving without destinationa map.
If history repeats it will repeat in large scale. So it's not the END OF
HISTORY, it's 'AND' IN GRANDHISTORY & both sides are bending it like
Bekham/Zidan.
The hyperbody discourse is not body but Aharya (make up & other
things) of body which dictates the terms of actions with its reduction/
addiction/ seduction capacities. Make up jewellaries costumesm, heels, boots,
ornaments & other accessories play bigger role in this discourse. Either
they maximize or minimize the body or ejaculate or dejaculate the pursuit of
ectasy & pleasure. The aharya with new accessories is threating the
conservative body construction of indigenous smell & Neohomerulism is
hardening it's course with hyperbody discourses which maintain the arguements
of static No- change attitudes in flux.
The question of Veil (Burqua) is thee hyperbodic metaphor whose
origin is incised in Text without centre of fixed meaning projected many faces
recently in Britain. Light (Al-Noor) 24:31 in KORAN is the centre of debate. I
am not quoting it because every English translation is debatable issue.
Here also we can trace three discourses
1) First on is Wishwiya Brahmni Discourse which interprete this sura as "Surely, Allah is well aware of that which they (women) do, Direct the believing women to restrain their looks and to gurad their senses and not to disclose any part of their beauty or their adornment, save that is perforce apparent there of. They should draw their head conversings across their bosoms and shoud not disclose any part of their beauty or their adornment..........................."
1) First on is Wishwiya Brahmni Discourse which interprete this sura as "Surely, Allah is well aware of that which they (women) do, Direct the believing women to restrain their looks and to gurad their senses and not to disclose any part of their beauty or their adornment, save that is perforce apparent there of. They should draw their head conversings across their bosoms and shoud not disclose any part of their beauty or their adornment..........................."
(Woman In Islam, Muhammad Zafrullah Khan Page19 published by Islam
International Publications Limited U.K.1988) Here Mulla Maulavi always says
that veil is necessary.
2) Kshetriya universal discourse accepted the above interpretation
but add that as India or U.K & other Unislamic Siyasat has their own law
and as Muslim woman is the citizen of that country she can follow the norms of
these contries.
3) Vishiya paraworldal discourse was limelighted when Dutch
parliament banned the veil (Burqa) by voting. After that Jack Straw remarks
that when he met his Muslim women constituents he oftern asked them to remove
their veils so that he could have a real face to face interaction. If created
controversy in UK. (See Times Of India 21-dated 7th oct 2006)
Salman rushdie the issue declaring it
as ‘’veils suck’’ in an interview with BBC video 4s he backed jack straw.
‘’speaking as somebody with three sisters & a very largly female
muslim family, there’s not a single woman I know in my family or among their
friends who would have accepted waering the veil. I think the battle
against the veil has been a long &
continuing battle against limitation of woman. So in that sense
I m the completely on (srraw’s) side.
He was expressing an important opinion which is that veil suck , which they
do I think the veil is the way of taking
power away from woman’’(see time of India
On 13th oct 2006 aishah azmi
was told that she could wear the veil in corridors & the staff room at
headfield church of the England
‘’(see times of India
Zeenat
shaukat ali, an Islamic scolar says ‘’queen dosen’t ask muslim woman use the
veil it want them to dress modesty & behave in a dignified manner’’.
‘’ burkha is
being perceived as a symbol of
the fundamentalist islam. If the west want debate on use of the veil , they
they cannot do it by forcing muslim woman to abandon it.’’, said Islamic scolar
asghan ali engineer .’’ the reform come from within the community.’’ ( time of India
The fact is the sura allowed to be unveil in the front of children but
aishah treated the whole issue as an issue of cultural identify. For AA
engineer it is perceived as a ‘’symbol’’ we can sy that the veil her
the become symbolic identify of culture of micro narrative against modern meganarrative
of the west in U.K. the veil turn into hyper body discourage of jihad which chalange the power of
interference of west in the Islamic
culture.
Now let’s discuss the issue reported by jyoti Punwani in times of India Krishna ,
nalini & others including christen one as staff) teacher appears in veil.
It was not easy for any one them to accept the job which entailed shrouding
themselves from head to toe in black . They
discussed it for hour at home & then accepted is an school uniform .’’ (times
of india -21 , 1oct 2006)’’
When
hindu teachers wear it as it’s a prerequisite condition of job ( i.e, market) management accept wearing of veil expected that the teachers.
Without any protest. But when muslim
teachers is ordered to unveil herself as a prerequisite condition of job it
became the question of cultural identify . It's an expression of inconsistence
& dual nature of neohomerulsim. Where muslims are in monority ,
multiculturism suddenly emerges as
progressive thought but if muslim are in power , minority of other cultures and religions should not raise the question & work as
muslim dictates the terms . Why it is so ? Probably ‘’the fear to be modern ‘’ or ‘’ the feel to
be powerful’’ or ‘’ the satisfaction to be honest with queen’’ or ‘’all of the
three & more’’
In both cases muslim are in minority . In U.K.
Mossoud shadjaresh , chairman of the
Islamic human rights commission said ,'' it was astonishing that straw choose to selectivity discriminated on
the basis of the religion ‘’.
Hilima Hussein , from the civil liberties group the muslim public
affairs committe rhetorically asked,'' Who is the jack straw comment on the
negative symbol within the religion that is not his own ?’’(time of India
In
Mumbai nobody protested as a majority is working in the minority school . It probably
indicates that when you are in minority
you become more sensitive about your hyperbody symbolic exchange . In Mumbai
another reason for nonprotest is an
easily acceptance of market as market , job as a job . In India , compare to
muslim , all non muslim teachers says,’’
it’s uniform’’ , uniform indicating modern uniformity.Does it mean that the
market orientation is more helpful to culture to acknowledge multiculturalism?
Or it is post-modern attitude of hindus that helps them to accept multiculturalism
?
Probably both reasons are valid.
What about muslim…? Markets are secular but it seems that islam will not
accept secular market so , they are fighting it.But what will they do after
victory.? They have to set up market for themselves. Probably they will set up
it but not outside the islam but inside islam.It will be Islamic market. The
market with identity. The hyper-market-body.
What’s the positions of ‘others’in this Islamic market ? As jyoti
punwani writes about hindu teachers in
uislamic school ,'' None of them would dream of wearing burkha after school
hours once they come outside the school . In school it’s a uniform , outside,
it becomes badge of religion identity. Perhaps that’s why though the burkha are
taken home to wash . they are not put out to dry.Neither neibours , nor
relative outside theirs immolates
families known they wear it.(burkha).’’
''I use to hang it (veil) out till a colleague told me not to '' say
nalini’’.
So
the religious identify of islam which becomes uniform in Islamic school (
please note that it's English school not
aerobic or urdu.) market & once job is over , ''the veil'' becomes the problem in ethos of majority’s & hindu teaches don’t dare to
put veils out to dry as neighbours will recognize that they wear ‘burkha’in their school.
The
market which demands the ‘’ others identity a donar who was under the influence of wishwiya religious discourse refused to make
any further donation when he learns that the staff include hindus . But that
has not shaken suhail sheikh ( the funder of school) as he belives to reward
talent instead of faith . For him talent is more important qualification than
faith.The only condition to talent of ‘others’ is to accept the Islamic body as
it is.
The debate between market
& neohomerulism is loosed upon the world experimenting with the internal
migration & mixing of O.B.C. , B.C., & S.T. constructing the pattern without centre of bhartiya
Diaspora especially in maharashtra .
asam , delhi & Punjab . In world it is
creating the Indian Diaspora especially in U.S.A , U.K. , CANADA & first
time in history of India the home rule phase find the non-residential audience
for it’s fast level addressing who listions it’s address , watches it movies
& trying to cape up with the hyper real Indian roots. It’s the sideeffeut of
chinhastushtiya yug / signoversal yug
in which everything can be programmed , or programmed to program . one
day or another day this hall where I m
delivering this lecture which is now commodity bound to be programmed & it’s every aspect ( i.e. chairs, doors,
windows, walls, etc.)will be controlled by remote control. That day it will
turn into seniority
This semioditification is helping
the diasporas & establishment of English( which was national margi
languages in pratisrushtiya of commodification ) as global mergi language in it's
true spirit. The bhartiya Diaspora has paved way for Hindustani as 4th meri language after Sanskrit ,
Persian & English . It was mainly designed by Bollywood & telewood . Right now Sanskrit &
Persian are dead in India
The bio-signoversal / chinhasrushtiya yug is
transforming all pratisrushtiya jeevanprabandhans into biosignoversal nets & our lifestyle are turning into
stylestatement . In this atmosphere we are the passing though the post post
industrial ethos which has created new incounter with Euro-america. In
pratisrushtiya yug the victory of british over us compelled as to rethink &
now an advancement of globalisation is complelling us to rethink about
everything & everybody.
It raises the following
questions…
1] What part of Euroamerican paradigms
should we put in our ethnicity & it’s Indian paradigm ?
2]What can we leave out & what can
we carry out with us in our existence
which is euroamerican ?
3]Should we be rather back to our
pratisrushtiya jeevandhara or srushtiya gharmis or wishwiya darshnan ?
4]Can we conduct our own orchestra of
paradigms & use European musicians only for special sound
effect.?
All these questions constitutes many
positions for discourse & this
position & positioning is part of discourse . Everything was solid in
universal liquid in srushtiya yug ,
gaseous in paraworldal yug. In bio-signoversal yug everything is turning in spandious / bitious &
the position is not only positioning
‘solidity’ or ‘liquidity’ or gaseousity but also spandiousity/bitiousity in which every individual & his
individuality is biosignoversing into either bital cloud or amoeba. An
intellectual can’t affort to be solid like rock or liquid like water in this
yug. He is also like an bital amoeba or cloud settled in his own body which is
travelling without knowing where he will rain his discourse .
Neo-residential global position:
The Indian diaspora created by Indians
structured this position which accept the forefather ness of Indian identify but not attached to Indian
ness . the position is without pass port & identify card is lost in
diaspora. Manoj night shyamlan & V.S. naipaul positioned this position in
their discourses . Manoj night shyamlan
creates the film structuring American ethos addressing the global audience of Hollywood
Residential global position:
It was the immediate reaction to new
arrival of post- industrialism from India India but under the total influence of euro America
[It published in saushthav Feb. 1993
issue]The poem was part of my
anti-commodification stance . Naturally it was without any image of
‘commodity or brand . I called this series as ‘nonthingist poems’ (nirvastuvadi
kavita)
The Eurocentric post modernity is now
ruling in our cosmopolitan newspapers & discourses created by residential
Indians who are global with same
shallowness which was prevailed in 19th century of Indian margi
class. In marathi gangadhar patil in his
writing has this position especially in context of poststruculturilism . Pan
Islamism is also another discourse produced by this position.
Non residential mergi position :
Marg means the path , the road, the
highway. Mergi means one who / which is on the path / the road / the highway .
Non-residential means who /
which is not resided in his own country . N.R.I.’s
are non residential who are either in this position or in position of
new residential global / deshi position . This position not only accepts the
Indian identity but positively or negatively address to it in its discourse . The
writing of salman rashdie is the best of
example of position . The postcolonialism is emerged from this position &
trying to transform itself in N.R.I. global position…
Residential mergi position :
This position is residential resided here but movable internally . It
dosen’t think globally but nationally. It is becoming strong especially in
cosmopolitan cities like , Mumbai, delhi ,
madras & Calcutta
Non residential deshi position :
This positin is very complicated , as generally , non residential can’t
held deshi side. The discourse of '' Nation of Jews '' is typical example of
this position which created Israel Tibet China
Residential deshi position :
This is the favourite
position of all neohomerulist who are producing the numbers of discourse today
today. Nativism, Islamism , palestinism , kashmiriyat, khalistani, tamilian in
srilanka are producing discourses of this position…
Residential poti ( subcultural) position :
In the culture of
diversity & multiculturalitry some parts are exploited by deshi or margi
streams . These parts rebel against either margi or deshi streams from this position & articulated
the alternative poti discourse . When poti paradigm rebel against the
margi / deshi paradigm
with the help of other margi / deshi paradigms they formulate the
discourse from this position for e.g
dalits are exploited by brahmani margi & deshi paradigms To encounter these discourse dalit formulated
their discourses with the help of nonbrahmanical boudha deshi & western
margi paradigms…
Residential jamti disourse position :
Non residential foreigner’s position:
The position will once against
become important as india is becoming
the leading market & outsiders from other countries now want to study her as
a market or for marketing . It will be interesting to see whether in-asian
paradigms will influence their own paradigms. When an outsider studies India
Residential foreigner’s position:
Instead of acting like as an outsider when foreigner studies India
The pratisrushtiya / paraworldal
yug created indology. In chinhasrusgtiya / bio-signoversal yug we have to
create continentology as special branch which will help to create continental
identify . For asia we need to create asian
identify. Last 15 years Europe is trying to create it’s own identify as a
continent . Recently george soras write an article ‘europe’s global mission '
He says,' Europe is in search of
identify . I believe it is easy to find
: the European union embodies the principles of open society which could serve
as a force for a global open society ’ europology is not yet established but
one day it will be created EU & euro are initial steps towards it.
For asialogy we have to internet all positions. Hindustani &
hinglish have every potential to become one of the leading internatal
continental margi language of asia but we must remember that every
continental margi paradigm must be
nourished by the deshi , poti, jamati substance. It is not easy to create asian
values . Dr. amartya sen has discussed
the complexities & difficulties in an essay
titled ‘ our culture-their culture ’ (see the arguementive Indian amrtya
sen penguin books pages (34-138) & pointed out that , ‘ in
our heterogeneity & in in our
openness lies our pride not disgrace .’’ No doubt openers is necessary but we
must be cautious about openness because many time our too much openness can
open the door for our disgrace…
Let’s
have an example . We always welcome non residential mergi position with
full openness but what happened ? Salman rushdie in an given to interview new
Yorker says, ‘ writing in English is a stronger & more important body of
work than most of what has been produced in the eighteen recognized languages
of the country ’ My question is how much literature MR. Rushdie has read before
this argument ? While editing an anthology of Indian writing ‘ the vintage book
of Indian writing ’ he straightway ignored deshi ( regional) poti jamati
literature as if only writing written in English is Indian & writing in
other Indian language is not Indian . It’s clearcut an insult of 80 crore-95
crore Indian who don’t read English literature.We have to criticize such arrogance &
highclass attitude , as it brings disgrace to our people . How can we see this
attitude ? Is Indian diaspora wanted to hijack India
from outside the india India Europe ?
We have to wait for some years to get correct answers of above questions.
Globalisation and Posthomerulism are
the special special process happening all over glob with market and culture as
weopon in hand . Their interests are clashing to each other . Though they are
fighting each other , both need nationility , emotionality , bodity and actionality
of people for their survival and
discourse and for carrying their mission and as I said earlier both are trying their
best to preserve them .Nobody wants to die in this clash and both are killing
each each other's real and symbolic biosignoversal bodies everywhere . Both
call each other EVIL AND SAITAN .
Does it mean that both are helping each
other to keep aliving each others identify ? In paraworldal yug both (communism
& capitalism ) ideologist were interdependent . are market & Posthomerulism are interdependent / bio-signoversal yug ?...
& capitalism ) ideologist were interdependent . are market & Posthomerulism are interdependent / bio-signoversal yug ?...
You may
feel that I am reading too much between the line rather among the lines.
My point is, while absorbing the essence of western paradigm we must be aware like
our forefather who set up their own orchestra of jeevandhara with enlightened
vision delimitating ideologies of western culture. In the
chinhasrushtiya yug the contact west is
unavoilabe but we must be careful & thoroughly aware above it.
EUROPEAN paradigms provided us two important dimension first one is the open
society & second one is pratyaksh praman especially in science &
technology. Now it is time to use them against EUROPEAN. In Marathi there is
a proverb ''Guruchi vidya gurula falali
'' It means the knowledge of guru is used by disciple against guru and by this
wiered process it became fruitful. It's our responsibility now to use it
without becoming blind . For it We must put questions before European
paradigms AND analyse
& deconstruct every aspects of EUROPEAN paradigms thoroughly. It will not only enhance the richness
of Indian paradigms but also help the world to enhance total richness of it’s worldnetworks.As Gandhi used to say ''Satyagraha not only enrich the ethics and morality
of satyagrahi but also compel those who
are in opposition to enhance their own spirituality.''
PART OF PAPER PRESENTED BY SHRIDHAR TILVE -NAIK IN AN INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ORGANISED BY JAWAHERLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY JNU DATED 17 TH JAN TO 20 TH JAN 2007
Comments
Post a Comment